RE: Q about arguments for God's existence.
July 10, 2014 at 12:02 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2014 at 12:25 pm by Lek.)
(July 9, 2014 at 11:54 pm)Esquilax Wrote: The definition of marriage in the US originally didn't encompass interracial marriages: it's already been changed in very recent history, so I wouldn't be dealing with the argument from tradition fallacy there. It doesn't serve your point at all.You're wrong on that. Some states outlawed interracial marriage, and it wasn't right to do so, by the way. That's not the same as saying that marriage is now a union of two persons of any sex, therefore, changing the definition of marriage.
(July 9, 2014 at 11:54 pm)Esquilax Wrote: I think the issue is that we wouldn't call upholding the separation of church and state to be persecution at all.
I agree with you on that. I wholeheartedly support separation of church and state. Not allowing freedom to follow your faith would be persecution.