Q about arguments for God's existence.

[Esquilax]

You're wrong on that. Some states outlawed interracial marriage, and it wasn't right to do so, by the way. That's not the same as saying that marriage is now a union of two persons of any sex, therefore, changing the definition of marriage.

More than half the states enforced anti-miscegenation laws, let's not pretend it was something restricted to the deep south. And they were only ruled unconstitutional in the late sixties, so if you want to talk about redefining marriage, it kinda seems like that's an American pastime.

More importantly, I find it interesting that you've decided that "one man one woman" is the definition of marriage. Seems sort of arbitrary, especially considering all the things involved in a biblical marriage that you're ignoring, like paying for your bride, among others. You're not even appealing to tradition- still a fallacy, by the way!- you're appealing to your own personal opinion.