(July 20, 2014 at 6:19 pm)Blackout Wrote: I thank critics if they are constructive, but you calling my morality retarded is not going to improve anything and will only serve to bring up a conflict if I wasn't such a collected calm person.I joined in after you threw a little wobbly for people calling your opinion naive. I continued to reply to you despite you clearly not seeming to get it so I think thats constructive enough.
(July 20, 2014 at 6:19 pm)Blackout Wrote: You can critique all you want, I don't care if it's a personal preference or sexual morality, I still think we should classify it as the latter, and I don't see any reason not to.That's stupid too. Calling all your preferences morality is just weird. Seriously, perhaps I might start calling everyone who doesn't like pizza immoral.
(July 20, 2014 at 6:19 pm)Blackout Wrote: If someone thought anal sex is immoral, what is wrong with that? If they think it's immoral, they don't practice it, it's simple, the same could be applied to oral sex, threesomes, eg I could say a threesome is sexually immoral if it's with my girlfriend since we are sharing our intimacy with a third party (I don't consider this immoral, it's actually she who thinks like this). So what's wrong in having my own thinking if I'm not forcing it into others?But by out and out calling a behavior with no context immoral is implying that others who do make the choice to do it are making an immoral one. Its just bizarre and unnecessary. Its a preference, that implies that it is not a matter of right or wrong just a choice based on personal feelings towards the thing.
