(July 20, 2014 at 6:26 pm)Bad Wolf Wrote:Sure it's a sexual preference then, I got it, thanks for all the inputs(July 20, 2014 at 6:19 pm)Blackout Wrote: I thank critics if they are constructive, but you calling my morality retarded is not going to improve anything and will only serve to bring up a conflict if I wasn't such a collected calm person. You can critique all you want, I don't care if it's a personal preference or sexual morality, I still think we should classify it as the latter, and I don't see any reason not to. Even if we used the expression 'personal preference' there are causes for preferences, some merely aesthetically, others could be related to morality and ethics, even if it was a personal preference it could have a morality cause, have you heard of sexual morality? If someone thought anal sex is immoral, what is wrong with that? If they think it's immoral, they don't practice it, it's simple, the same could be applied to oral sex, threesomes, eg I could say a threesome is sexually immoral if it's with my girlfriend since we are sharing our intimacy with a third party (I don't consider this immoral, it's actually she who thinks like this). So what's wrong in having my own thinking if I'm not forcing it into others?
Because when lots of people who all agree on something being immoral, get together, they legislate laws based on their opinion. Homosexuality for example. Homosexuals were persecuted greatly in the past and in some places they still are. Homosexuality isn't immoral because it doesn't hurt anyone. Anal sex isn't immoral because it doesn't hurt anyone. Threesomes are not immoral because they don't hurt anyone.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you