RE: Hey Anti-Theists! Prove Your Claim
August 12, 2014 at 7:35 am
(This post was last modified: August 12, 2014 at 7:36 am by Ben Davis.)
(August 12, 2014 at 5:48 am)Rhythm Wrote: That, my friend, is anti-theism.I have to refer you to Blackout's definitions here. Anti-theism has multiple definitions stemming from the literal 'opposition to theism'. Although not very well worded, Chad's challenge does point at those who fall under the definition 'actively claim the non-existence of theistic propositions'. I know that's not the definition which applies to you but for those who make the positive claim that god doesn't exist (one of the christian gods, in this case, I assume?), they do have a burden of proof to satisfy (like Brakeman's statement).
To the OP, for the Abrahamic gods, I fall in to this category. They cannot exist as many logical attribute definitions are mutually exclusive (e.g. the 'omni' qualities). They are an impossible proposition.
Sum ergo sum