(August 14, 2014 at 9:41 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(August 14, 2014 at 2:38 am)OfficerVajardian Wrote: According to Russell's Teapot, the person who is making the claim (you and other theists) should be the one carrying the Burden of Proof, not the people doubting your claim (me and other Atheists and Anti-Theists).Russell's teapot does not apply. The OP is directed toward gnostic* atheists who are making a claim that they know God does not exist.
So the real question should be:
"Where is your evidence that God/Gods exists?"
*I misunderstood the usage of the term anti-theist in the OP but that mistake was corrected by the posts of others.
While we can't disprove the existence of a generic god, we can certainly disprove the existence of the malevolent prick you cravenly worship.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.