RE: Ferguson: too much or not enough?
August 19, 2014 at 7:27 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2014 at 7:30 pm by Drich.)
(August 19, 2014 at 12:11 am)Esquilax Wrote:The death penalty can be carried out by citizen in a position to stop a felony crime, intentional death or seriously bodily harm. (That is why george Zimmerman was not even initially detained after killing treyvon.)(August 18, 2014 at 11:29 pm)Drich Wrote:
The only revelant question is Did the douche bag rob a store or not? If he did then know he assassinated his own character.
Just because the cop did not know what mike did 30 minutes before walking down the center of the road, does not mean mike forgot what he did. Meaning when that cop went to pull him to the side, Mike most likly assumed he was going to jail and needlessly escalated the situation himself. (The cop did not beat himself up.) beat up a cop, get shot. Thats kinda a rule a thumb no matter what color you are.
That's funny, I didn't know you Yanks had the death penalty for robbery.
In some states one can add the crime of tresspassing or even property damage.
So beating up a cop is indeed a crime the officer has the right to be judge jury and executioner.
That it is why people/smart people do not start fights with people whos jobs require them to be armed.
(August 19, 2014 at 6:44 am)Brakeman Wrote:I think i died a little inside to give you that kudo, but in this case it is well deserved. You have said a few really good things, but my pride just would let me kudo you.. Maybe i need to evaluate my beliefs if i am agreeing so much with you.(August 19, 2014 at 12:36 am)Minimalist Wrote: Or -
http://data.newsday.com/crime/nassau-police/
I suppose someone who uncritically believes the bullshit you believe will accept just about anything that an authority figure tells you. You should work on being less of a credulous fool.
I think this is absolutely true and should be strongly remembered in judging the claims from the police. However, it is the black witnesses' testimonies that have been impeached so far with the physical evidence, not the cop's.
When are you going to admit this? When are you going to admit that the two main black witnesses' testimonies that was initially relayed to all the sensation loving media and started the greater riot reaction were lying. They were lying and you and so many others believed them. The guy was not shot in the back.
When are you going to admit that:
1. He was not a honest guy crossing the street.
2. He had committed a very recent crime and would have freaked at the presence of a policeman.
3. He Was in a belligerent, aggressive mood.
4. He was shot about 6 times from the front, corroborating at least in part, with the cop's released testimony.
5. The black witness's testimonies that have been so widespread, have been racist lies, pure racist lies.