Is the Argument for Religion Rejection a benefit?

[Goosebump]

I'm not entirely convinced you're not a poe.

Forgive my ignorance I do not know what a “poe” is. Is it a sock puppet? I've seen that on your forum and don't understand how 'poe' fits as an acronym. I am not a “sock puppet” and you can readily check my IP, I'm always who I say I am.
Anyway, to put it bluntly.

Why are you even bringing in the born agains.
They are far and few between.
Whatever their motives are, it will have a negligible impact on society either way.
Nuff said.

I guess I dug myself a hole there. “Born Again” is a self professed thing and not something that gets lumped into any category. A “Born Again” could be an Evangelical or Protestant or Catholic or anything. So your right, I don't have much to to go on. I spend the last hour looking for solid “Born Again”, “Returned to Christ”, “First Time Christains” and could find any kind of solid polls to solidify that.

However I did find this one.

I'm not sure or clear if I can post a link so I'll just put it in here and you can Copy/Past it if you care to see. It's of your congress circa 2011.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2011/02/...filiation/#

Doesn't help my argument any? I say it does... over 55% christian, nearly 30% catholic. I'd say it helps to be if your running for office.

As for the indoctrinated, that's also no my argument. Even if they are does it not help them with:
Networking.
Political point scoring.
Socializing. (in their cliches)

Is it no a benefit? Is it not desirable?

Begrudgingly arguing,

~ GB