Is the Argument for Religion Rejection a benefit?

[ignoramus]

I'm not entirely convinced you're not a poe.

Forgive my ignorance I do not know what a “poe” is. Is it a sock puppet? I've seen that on your forum and don't understand how 'poe' fits as an acronym. I am not a “sock puppet” and you can readily check my IP, I'm always who I say I am.
Anyway, to put it bluntly.

Why are you even bringing in the born agains.
They are far and few between.
Whatever their motives are, it will have a negligible impact on society either way.
Nuff said.

I guess I dug myself a hole there. “Born Again” is a self professed thing and not something that gets lumped into any category. A “Born Again” could be an Evangelical or Protestant or Catholic or anything. So your right, I don't have much to to go on. I spend the last hour looking for solid “Born Again”, “Returned to Christ”, “First Time Christains” and could find any kind of solid polls to solidify that.

However I did find this one.

I'm not sure or clear if I can post a link so I'll just put it in here and you can Copy/Past it if you care to see. It's of your congress circa 2011.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2011/02/...filiation/#

Doesn't help my argument any? I say it does... over 55% christian, nearly 30% catholic. I'd say it helps to be if your running for office.

As for the indoctrinated, that's also no my argument. Even if they are does it not help them with:
Networking.
Political point scoring.
Socializing. (in their cliches)

Is it no a benefit? Is it not desirable?

Begrudgingly arguing,

~ GB

Sure it's a benefit. As long as you understand it's not a choice.
Nobody can honestly turn religious for those gains.
It doesn't work like that. Only an already religious person may or may not take advantage of existing situations in their circles.

Not sure what you ultimate point is?