To quote from the article:
Jesus can be whatever a believer wants him to be...whenever he needs him to be it.
Hard to differentiate 'jesus' from a lump of silly putty in that regard.
Quote:“The historical Jesus (if there was one) might well have been a messianic king, or a progressive Pharisee, or a Galilean shaman, or a magus, or a Hellenistic sage. But he cannot very well have been all of them at the same time.” John Dominic Crossan of the Jesus Seminar grumbles that “the stunning diversity is an academic embarrassment.”
Jesus can be whatever a believer wants him to be...whenever he needs him to be it.
Hard to differentiate 'jesus' from a lump of silly putty in that regard.