RE: Atheistic Dogma- Scientific Fundamentalism
September 12, 2014 at 11:18 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2014 at 11:19 am by One Above All.)
(September 12, 2014 at 11:11 am)TaraJo Wrote: I'm also willing to bet you're equally wrong on quantium physics, but that's a field of physics that even physicists don't entirely believe in or really understand, anyway (not to mention, there seems to be a bit of freedom to make stuff up and claim that it's real somewhere because in an infinite universe, it has to be real somewhere).
...Wut?
Quantum physics is as accepted as Einstein's Theory of Relativity. It's fairly well understood as well (at least as much as is to be expected after less than a century of research): things at the quantum level are ruled by randomness, rather than causality (NOTE: This is a very, very, very simplistic explanation).
As for "an infinite universe", we don't know if the Universe is infinite, but, even if it were, for something to occur in an infinite universe, it still needs to have a likelihood higher than 0%. Is it possible for matter or energy to be created or destroyed? No. Is it possible for an electron to remain still? Also no. Is it possible for an atom to decay spontaneously, regardless of what kind of atom it is? Yes.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?