@ Brian : you are the one insisting on a physically extant God who is not physically extant. To me that's beyond belief. Like the hunt for square circles. How do you keep on with that?
I don't know how many times I've said this in this thread for you to keep on ignoring it: religion is not science. I don't replace any of my understanding of science with my belief in God. Can I get a confirmation that you acknowledge that I've said that? I'm sick of repeating it.
Progress in scientific knowledge doesn't change belief in God one little bit. It isn't the same subject. Understanding the universe and how it runs is not the subject of religion.
There is a point to religion, and scientific enquiry isn't it. I can't quite believe that has to be said to an adult. The point to religion is meaning and purpose. To improve your life by practical and sound knowledge.
What we have today is the misplaced faith in science to provide that knowledge, and of course science makes no comment on it.
How ignorant are we thinking we're so much better yet failing so badly.
I don't know how many times I've said this in this thread for you to keep on ignoring it: religion is not science. I don't replace any of my understanding of science with my belief in God. Can I get a confirmation that you acknowledge that I've said that? I'm sick of repeating it.
Progress in scientific knowledge doesn't change belief in God one little bit. It isn't the same subject. Understanding the universe and how it runs is not the subject of religion.
There is a point to religion, and scientific enquiry isn't it. I can't quite believe that has to be said to an adult. The point to religion is meaning and purpose. To improve your life by practical and sound knowledge.
What we have today is the misplaced faith in science to provide that knowledge, and of course science makes no comment on it.
How ignorant are we thinking we're so much better yet failing so badly.