Yes I pick on all religions.

[fr0d0]

You are simply incorrect.

There is not a single logical argument for the existence of a god that is without at least one fallacy.

The Cosmological Argument, Teleological Argument, Ontological Argument, TAG, have all been shown to be flawed, either in asserting the truth of premises, or validity of the arguments themselves.

Coupled with the lack of evidence, which you say should not even exist, and the only conclusion a critical thinker could come to is that there is no justification to believe.

As pickup said, I'm personally not looking to prove positively the logic of belief. I understand it to be a level playing field, and that's only right. Because I must believe on faith (act upon information that I trust to be true).

I disagree that all those arguments are flawed. I've seen them successfully defended on here. But again, those arguments never overstep the mark of faith being a requirement.

So I'm not incorrect. You are misunderstanding my position.

---

I think you've got nothing Brian.