(September 13, 2014 at 4:32 pm)Bad Wolf Wrote: They use the same reasoning as you and yet come to different conclusions. That means that there is something wrong with your reasoning.
BINBO!
When you have competing claims once you listen to all those competing claims you notice the pattern that they are using the same flawed logic, the fact that they come to different god claims and different books to justify those claims still starts with a naked assertion.
Once you start from a naked assertion, anything that follows is going to be a house of cards built on sand. It is the same no matter who does this or what pet god claim they have.
Evidence that is universal is not based on a naked assertion. It is built on prior established and tested data, and will pass any scrutiny of outsiders when the data is correct and the methodology is sound.
"Faith" does not do that nor can it do that.
