Yes I pick on all religions.

[fr0d0]

Why not? If someone has evidence and that brings you to facts you'd ignore facts just because you like your position?

Oh for goodness sake. We're talking about arguments FOR the existence of God here right. I'm not interested in philosophical games. I'm aware of these arguments and those against. They're all nonsense that just prove that there cannot be belief without faith. We, you and I, win.

---

Your assertion that Genesis is not a creation story is simply absurd. So, there's that.

So you read the book/ are aware of my position? Let's hear your rebuttal then.

Humans are not gods, no. They are evidence of his creation, just like everything else in existence.

You can look at that any way you like. But If you want physical evidence of God, that's how you're framing the question, then his physical creation is all around you.

There is no proving independently that God made anything. I thought we'd established that. Unless you know different of course.

Carry on.

Nope - there is no evidence for your assertions; you haven't even tried to present any. Scientists have very good explanations for where humans came from, you don't. All you have is 'feels'.

So I will dismiss your unsupported, unevidenced assertions..

What assertions? Methinks now that you are whistling to the wind. The point that you are making has been properly dismissed several times now. Science class is down the hall.

---

"You are closed minded" is the argument of the politically correct. None of logic or scientific method has anything to do with being closed minded. It is like accusing a hammer of having an opinion. A hammer is a tool, it is not a political party or religion or opinion.

As Neil Degrees Tyson has said "The good thing about science is that it does not care if you accept it or not".

"Close minded" is sticking with a naked assertion. "Close minded" is living in the past. "Close minded is keeping a position despite facts being contrary to one's position".

So are you going to enlighten us of these logical flaws yet or are you going to keep us waiting.

Seems like you're a one trick pony. Or is that two...
1. A logical fallacy
2. Saying that you know of logical flaws when you don't