The responses here prove to me two things: 1.) a lot of people don't read with comprehension (OP is talking to gnostic atheists, and EVERYBODY chimes in...come on now.....); and 2.)instead of the pat line "define your god first", let's define OUR OWN TERMS FIRST.
The first declared 'gnostic atheist' here had his/her own definition, which I saw as wrong -- gnosticism is a stand of 'knowledge', period. It's a claim that you KNOW, one way or the other. SO, to ANYONE who claims gnosticism, I'd say "Prove it."
Whether theist OR atheist, if you're HONEST, you'll also claim agnosticism, since you DON'T "KNOW".
The first declared 'gnostic atheist' here had his/her own definition, which I saw as wrong -- gnosticism is a stand of 'knowledge', period. It's a claim that you KNOW, one way or the other. SO, to ANYONE who claims gnosticism, I'd say "Prove it."
Whether theist OR atheist, if you're HONEST, you'll also claim agnosticism, since you DON'T "KNOW".
"I THINK, therefore I am DANGEROUS..."
