Atheistic Dogma- Scientific Fundamentalism

[Tonus]

So again, I posed a question to you all (particularly those who accused me of strawmanning) asking about your level of confidence (0-100%) that there is no intriguing evidence pointing to intelligent design and influence. Only a few have responded, both reporting 100% confidence.

That's a curious way to word the question, but perhaps it's the more accurate way as well. I think that "intriguing evidence" is probably a placeholder for "emotion." I find that the argument from design is more emotional than rational, and given to the sort of sloppy and hopeful arguments that you've been putting forth in the various topics you've started.

So no, I don't find that there is any "intriguing evidence pointing to intelligent design." I am more likely to be swayed by a rational or logical argument than by an emotional one. But even that might only reduce the certainty by a few points, unless you have an argument or evidence that is compelling enough to overturn everything I happen to know or understand. You don't seem to, and "but what if this" is not compelling.