Atheistic Dogma- Scientific Fundamentalism

[Mister Agenda]

So again, I posed a question to you all (particularly those who accused me of strawmanning) asking about your level of confidence (0-100%) that there is no intriguing evidence pointing to intelligent design and influence. Only a few have responded, both reporting 100% confidence.

If you want to conduct a poll, there's a way to do that.

Honestly, I am not convinced that any of you were justified in saying I was strawmanning.

Are the people who thought you were strawmanning and the people who said they were 100% certain the same people?

I don't think I was misjudging at all what it is that you think.

Because of your sample size of two out of hundreds?

In fact, the assumption I was making (and the comparison I made to my atheist friends) seems to be quite accurate at this point.

It seems to be highly important to you to have been right in the first place.

I have not had a single one of those that shamed me respond that something they have experienced, read, heard, etc has made them question the possibility of ID.

Now you're 'moving the goalposts'. When did we have to experience, read, or hear something to make us question the possibility of ID? Of course it's possible. It just doesn't seem to match the facts of what's the case here on earth. I expect if we ever colonize Mars, there will be plenty of evidence of ID there, because we'll be doing the ID-ing, as we've done all the ID-ing thus far discovered (until the robots take over ID-ing from us).

I feel lied to at this point.

You HAVE demonstrated a penchant for the melodramatic. Two people give the answers you expect, and all the people who objected to your characterisation of them must have lied to you.

Like I said, I'm 80% confident in ID based on my observations and the opinions I've formed of them. I don't care if what I shared does not sway your opinion. I wasn't trying to.

Fair enough. You 're entitled to your opinion. I tend to focus on facts, but I'm not everyone here.

They're my thoughts and ideas and I was hoping to discuss them with people who do not fit the definition of that "strawman".

If you were a little less determined to 'discover' that your strawman is made of bricks, it might be easier to get that discussion.

If I was right, thanks a lot for convincing me that it was possible to get the discussion I was looking for. Sucks to be shamed and lied to at the same time.

I hope you come back and read this again when you're a little older. I bet you'll lrealize you've learned a lot since now.

A bit of advice for the future, drop the "strawman", "strawman" shaming game at times when what's being said is true. It's misleading.

A bit of advice for the future: don't jump to conclusions about a whole community based on two data points.

---

conceptual polyfiller

4000 years ago

The problem is if you find God in the gaps, those gaps keep shrinking.

Conceptual polyfiller haha! +1

Citation needed :p

QFT

You quote yourself for truth? Really?