RE: Atheistic Dogma- Scientific Fundamentalism
September 18, 2014 at 1:22 pm
(This post was last modified: September 18, 2014 at 1:34 pm by sswhateverlove.)
(September 18, 2014 at 1:07 pm)Surgenator Wrote:(September 18, 2014 at 12:55 pm)sswhateverlove Wrote: Mind-matter interface experiments are an interesting example.So your posting psuedoscience crap.
Ok, so double slit experiments? Also psuedoscience?
(September 18, 2014 at 1:19 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(September 18, 2014 at 1:18 pm)sswhateverlove Wrote: I wasn't. That's why I directed the statement at Rhythm.
Then try to work on your reading comprehension. Nobody is saying what you claim we're saying.
Why don't you let Rhythm respond for himself? The "we" is misused in this statement. Unless you and Rhythm share a mind? Now that would be interesting...
(September 18, 2014 at 1:11 pm)Bibliofagus Wrote: About the 80% thing... Didn't you say you were 80% sure ID was somehow true in your view? Forgive me for asking. I get confused every now and then.
Yes, I would say 80% confident based on my personal opinions formed based on my experience that consciousness/intelliegence plays a much larger role than previously assumed. I'm leaving a pretty big opening (20% chunk of confidence) that science will determine that consciousness/intelligence has absolutely nothing to do with our existence, but I think it's more likely it will be the opposite.
I think leaving 20% open to persuasion is a lot better than 0% or .1%, but that's my opinion. Can't learn what you already think you know, right?
