(September 20, 2014 at 4:40 pm)whateverist Wrote:On thread, the mechanisms for the existence of anti-atheists are like those of antidisestablishmentarians: they're a natural cycle of our defensive mechanisms. It's often born from the fact that the composition of most theisms are so obviously mythological that the simple existence of atheism is a direct and serious threat; sometimes it comes from the (mistaken) belief that atheism = antitheism. Whatever the cause, theism has an 'opponent'. If someone opposes theism then we can expect someone to oppose those who oppose theism. The arguments themselves are largely irrelevant, defense of sincerely held belief is human nature.
Re. vicarious redemption, all I have to say is John 3:16. All denominations of Christianity agree on this:
Quote:For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal lifeArguing about whether there was 'sacrifice' or not is beside the point: the redemption is vicarious by definition.
Drich, your attempts to sidestep the issue are disingenuous in the extreme. You would not be a Christian if you didn't believe John 3:16. Your apologetics fall flat in the face of your own scripture.
Sum ergo sum