Implied BJ on Jesus, atheists support teen.

[Chad32]

There are better ways of expressing freedom of speech than rubbing your crotch on a statue's face. He wasn't trying to be deep and insightful. He was trying to tick people off. He succeeded.

You'll have to show me the section of law that requires freedom of speech to be deep and insightful. Ticking people off is a major point of free speech.

Danish cartoons, South Park, Doonesbury, Dilbert, George Carlin, Bible/Quran burning, Jesse Jackson, KKK marches...all offensive to somebody. Too damn bad.

The entire point is protection of *offensive* speech. If the speech wasn't offensive, it wouldn't need protection in the first place.

From the DA's comments, it is clear this is a Christian jihad against this young man. If it was a statue of Zeus or Venus, I doubt any charges would be brought.

In this country, at least for now, we don't allow charges to be brought for any sort of blasphemy. Now is not a good time to bring back those repulsive laws either.

I was not aware that the sole purpose of South Park was to be offensive. It's comical and thought provoking. Humping a Jesus statue in Jesus country isn't thought provoking.

There's saying controversial things, and there's trolling. He's a troll, and he got what he wanted.