(September 26, 2014 at 10:36 am)Rhythm Wrote: You already know my thoughts on the matter. Vicarious redemption is immoral. I've explained why I hold this position (multiple times). You can dispute my position anytime you like, using any of the examples I've given (or any of your own devising, which I will respond to...as I have to every example offered).
You've already stated that you would help me keep jesus off the cross, all that's left (for me, anyway) is to figure out why you've accepted the ill gotten gains of an act that you would prevent.
Are you in the habit of accepting stolen merchandise?
Are you the kind of person that would rummage through a dead mans wallet?
Would you accept an award for the work that another has done?
Would you let another serve a term for a crime you've committed?
All I know is that you find it immoral. I don't know why. So it's hollow reasoning to me.
Everyone would and did try to prevent it happening. Nothing revolutionary there. The act was a deliberate one. The point of that persons life.
Over and over again you make ridiculous comparisons, like the one above with stolen merchandise??? And rigging a dead man??? If that's supposed to be reasoning then I think you're all mouth and no trousers.
