RE: Rant against anti-atheist agnostics.
September 26, 2014 at 4:05 pm
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2014 at 4:08 pm by Simon Moon.)
(September 26, 2014 at 2:29 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: All I know is that you find it immoral. I don't know why. So it's hollow reasoning to me.
Everyone would and did try to prevent it happening. Nothing revolutionary there. The act was a deliberate one. The point of that persons life.
Over and over again you make ridiculous comparisons, like the one above with stolen merchandise??? And rigging a dead man??? If that's supposed to be reasoning then I think you're all mouth and no trousers.
Have you ever watched "Kissing Hank's Ass"?
Only about 7 minutes long.
After watching this, let us know if you think the scenario depicted is moral or immoral.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
