Implied BJ on Jesus, atheists support teen.

[Heywood]

Can I just take a moment to highlight how completely bizarre and nonsensical this question is? "What if the active object in the situation was something completely different to what it is in reality? What would you do then, if the entire context of the discussion was completely changed, huh? Hypocrite!"

Heywood, you can't expose an inconsistency when you have to completely change the scenario being argued about to do it, because at that point you'd be arguing about something different.

Desecration laws exist to protect the sensibilities of a community. The hypocrisy is people believing their sensibilities should be protected but other peoples shouldn't.......cause their nasty Christians......and that makes the DA evil for pandering to them. That seems to be the position of many on this forum.

Consistency is achieved by acknowledging that other people might not have the same sensibilities as you and it might be right to protect those sensibilities because they are widely shared by the community at large. Another way to achieve consistency is taking the position that any desecration that doesn't involve property destruction should not be criminalized.....including simulated sex acts with corpses.

Last, I am not arguing a different senario. We are talking about desecrating but not damaging physically....an inanimate object that some people hold dear. I am changing inconsequential details of the senario to point out other people's hypocrisy. That hypocrisy being "no physical harm to the thing you hold dear....no prosecution.....no physical harm to the thing I hold dear....doesn't matter....you desecrated it and should go to jail."

---

What if the statue were a Hydrogen Bomb, and your penis the Trigger? WHAT THEN?

Sex with a hydrogen bomb?......That would be a Blast!