RE: Rant against anti-atheist agnostics.
September 28, 2014 at 8:14 pm
(This post was last modified: September 28, 2014 at 8:27 pm by fr0d0.)
(September 28, 2014 at 8:09 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Tell us what you know about reality.
Haha well you weren't specific at all were you lol.
Reality is talking straight. Here some reality for you: I fully accept everything concluded by science and I find nothing conflicts with my beliefs.
Your turn.
I guess you're not so easily shaken off Rhythm. Mouth. Trousers.
The connection to me is explicit. Some nutter topped himself for no good reason. Like I said, I think HIS action is possibly immoral. Like I said above, taking any life is seen as immoral. I don't agree, otherwise I wouldn't eat meat.
Do you think eating humans is morally acceptable? Peter Stringer the secular ethicist does. When the person is dead and there are no people that would be affected.
It only exists if I choose to accept the connection? So he doesn't kill himself if I refuse his offer? Cool. I refuse. There is no good reason for me to accept. The sacrifice outweighs the debt owed. A lesser sacrifice I might accept. Up to the extent that he gives me money to pay the debt, if I'm satisfied of his motivation. Morally, I would think it then acceptable to take the gift. Not before.
