Implied BJ on Jesus, atheists support teen.

[Heywood]

There is a law on the books since 1973 and it hasn't been struck down. So at the moment they are legally allowed to prosecute the kid.

Does the Piss Christ artist commandeer the other peoples property? If he does then I would probably argue he could be subject to prosecution.

If the kid owned the statue....then yes I think a very good argument can be made that the kid has a first amendment right. But the kid didn't own the statue and Freedom of speech doesn't give one the right to commandeer other peoples property to use a prop in ones speech.

Hate to break it to you...just because a law's been around for a while doesn't mean it's consitutional or moral.

Hate to break it to you....but a law is the law until it is either repealed or stuck down.