RE: Implied BJ on Jesus, atheists support teen.
September 29, 2014 at 12:33 pm
(This post was last modified: September 29, 2014 at 12:34 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(September 26, 2014 at 2:33 pm)Heywood Wrote:(September 26, 2014 at 2:27 pm)Exian Wrote: Ok, I'll pretend the facts are different...
Hey! You're right now!
I am right because if our constitution allows the law to protect corpses from desecration there is no substantial reason why it can't protect privately owned religious statues from desecration. The fact that the two inanimate objects are made of different things is immaterial.
The fact that one of those has to be stolen before you can desecrate it is very material.
(September 26, 2014 at 2:42 pm)JesusHChrist Wrote: Corpses are in no way treated the same as statues.
You can have sex with a statue, but not with a corpse.
Why are you avoiding a statue-to-statue comparison?
Well, a fair comparison doesn't lead to the desired conclusion.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
