RE: Christians: Please explain the Exodus
September 30, 2014 at 2:31 pm
(This post was last modified: September 30, 2014 at 2:32 pm by Exian.)
I think may favorite part of this thread (and there are many) is Drich claiming whole cities have been erased by the desert without a trace! How would you know a city existed at all if there is zero trace evidence of it? This isn't a groundbreaking question, it's almost the only one that follows
After looking it up (kudos), you come back with, and I'm paraphrasing, "Well, there is a trace, but we can only see it with satellites, but where's the pottery and graves!?!" Well, if we've only viewed this city's foundation with satellites, then there hasn't been a dig, so I'm willing to bet the graves and pottery are underground near the foundation. When using a ground penetrating imaging system, it's harder to conclude on smaller pieces and bits if they're seen; it's much easier to conclude on large structures.
After looking it up (kudos), you come back with, and I'm paraphrasing, "Well, there is a trace, but we can only see it with satellites, but where's the pottery and graves!?!" Well, if we've only viewed this city's foundation with satellites, then there hasn't been a dig, so I'm willing to bet the graves and pottery are underground near the foundation. When using a ground penetrating imaging system, it's harder to conclude on smaller pieces and bits if they're seen; it's much easier to conclude on large structures.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
