(September 30, 2014 at 3:15 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I have came up of one point why it is important that Exodus is literal. During the transfiguratio Moses appears, but if exodus didn't happen then why does he appear, without exodus we have no reasons to believe Moses esisted even though he is mentioned throughout the Bible.
That's pretty thin. Wouldn't it have been easier to just edit out that one mention of a guy called moses and leave it at that?
You've already said you don't care if it's true, as long as it helps christianity along. The exodus thing is not doing that by a long shot, and this would have been easily cured by not mentioning moses at all.
