Heywood, you are making things up as you go along. Do you think no one will notice?
Can you point out the law against "commandeering an object to be used as a free-speech prop"? According to most every legal interpretation, that which isn't expressly prohibited is legal.
There are laws against stealing or vandalism but no such law as you are attempting to invoke. The object of discussion was neither stolen nor vandalized. It remains exactly where it was, and in the same condition.
Point out such a law in the Pennsylvania legal code.
The law this kid was charged with violating is a thinly disguised blasphemy law.
I can't wait for this to reach the end game and this idiocy to be finished.
Can you point out the law against "commandeering an object to be used as a free-speech prop"? According to most every legal interpretation, that which isn't expressly prohibited is legal.
There are laws against stealing or vandalism but no such law as you are attempting to invoke. The object of discussion was neither stolen nor vandalized. It remains exactly where it was, and in the same condition.
Point out such a law in the Pennsylvania legal code.
The law this kid was charged with violating is a thinly disguised blasphemy law.
I can't wait for this to reach the end game and this idiocy to be finished.
