(September 30, 2014 at 8:10 pm)snowtracks Wrote:(September 30, 2014 at 1:51 am)Esquilax Wrote: It's a bald assertion, is what it is. Especially since, in real terms, we know that consciousness does not come from consciousness: a developing infant gains consciousness over time, from the non-conscious matter that forms them.what the hell was that? would have to conclude you have descended into madness.
Moreover, you could artificially inseminate a brain dead woman using the semen from a brain dead man, and still get a pregnancy. Consciousness simply is not required in the development of consciousness. Your inferential relationship is nothing more than wishful thinking that you pulled out of your ass.
I'm not saying one should do that, but it's a simple, eminently possible formulation that demonstrates the incorrectness of your position. But please, continue to dodge out of the way and ignore everything that might hold you accountable to the flaws in your own argumentation, as though covering your ears is the same thing as any kind of refutation.

"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!