RE: Conclusive proof of God
October 4, 2014 at 3:55 am
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2014 at 3:58 am by jesus_wept.)
I think this is a non answerable question because the criteria for what god is changes so drastically amongst believers that what is proof of one god is not proof of another. I mean would a christian believe it if Krishna came down and proved he was Krishna? I don't think so, and I think they would carry.on believing in thier god because Krishna doesn't fit their definition of what god is. And this applies to the vast multitude of contradictory gods believed in today.
I suppose what I'm saying is that I would first need a precise definition of what god is before I can know what would be considered evidence.
Edit - you beat me to it downbeatplumb.
I suppose what I'm saying is that I would first need a precise definition of what god is before I can know what would be considered evidence.
Edit - you beat me to it downbeatplumb.