RE: Conclusive proof of God
October 4, 2014 at 10:35 am
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2014 at 10:37 am by *Deidre*.)
(October 4, 2014 at 3:18 am)Surgenator Wrote:(October 4, 2014 at 3:14 am)satsujin Wrote: Maybe she knows there isn't one so she doesn't bother. This should be a proof that works for everyone, not just you. I suppose it could manifest as different proofs that matched each person's criteria, but this would cause difference on opinion on what the actual proof was.
If she can't proof to me she exist, then there is no way she is God. You can prove to me that you exist. You can prove to the world that you exist. Are you saying God is incapable of doing what you can do, a mere mortal?
Well said.
I've often wondered too why would an all powerful, all knowing God choose only a handful of people thousands of years ago to "show" itself? And that's it. And all generations thereafter are to just accept or believe a book of stories from those people, or they risk "perishing?
I suppose the rebuttal could be that faith doesn't require reason. At least that is a rebuttal I heard when I left Christianity.