RE: Conclusive proof of God
October 4, 2014 at 3:22 pm
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2014 at 3:27 pm by Mudhammam.)
(October 4, 2014 at 3:24 am)Luckie Wrote: For me, god claimant would have to show me history being reversed. Otherwise even if it was god, it would have no respect from me.What happened in 33 A.D.?
(October 4, 2014 at 2:22 pm)satsujin Wrote: If you think the plausibility of God matches that of vampires and faeries which are are always presented as fantasy then you have obviously closed your mind to the concept of God. And from other responses here so have most others. So much so that you were not willing to put that aside to entertain a thought experiment. And that's fine. You are entitled to your opinion. It just proves to me how nearly impossible it would be for God to prove himself in this world even just among skeptics who should have no preconceived notion of what God should be. Maybe I wrong. Maybe believers would accept this God being quicker. In any case, I am unsubscribing from this thread. I have learnt what I needed to know.Understandably, it would be impossible for a non-existent God to prove himself to skeptics...or anyone for that matter. For an actual deity, with powers that include the creation of Universes from nothing, however, it would be quite easy. How about formulating a constellation of stars that spell out in human language, "Greetings my beloved skeptics!"
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza