RE: Implied BJ on Jesus, atheists support teen.
October 4, 2014 at 4:01 pm
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2014 at 4:12 pm by Chas.)
(September 26, 2014 at 9:58 am)Chad32 Wrote: Na, I think if you're going to do something stupid like that, you probably deserve what's coming to you. Next he'll run through a Jewish town screaming Heil Hitler! There is nothing constructive about what he did, so why do people care what happens to him?
You mean, why do people care about Constitutional rights?
(September 26, 2014 at 5:59 pm)Heywood Wrote:(September 26, 2014 at 2:56 pm)Exian Wrote: The idea that an inaccurate statue of a middle-eastern guy, who may have never existed (so I guess, make him look however you want?), should be treated with the same respect as a recently deceased body, who has living family members, is just another example of twisted religious thinking.
Hump a dead body- 2 years dungeeeooon!
Hump a statue- 2 years dungeeeeooon!
???
How much respect you give something is a matter of personal choice. My thinking may or may not be religious but yours is clearly errant. The question is not about how much respect you give inanimate objects. The question at hand is this: Does the constitution give one person the freedom to desecrate something belonging to another person. I think you realize it does not but just don't want to admit you are wrong. So you take this silly position that its not okay to desecrate a human body....but it is okay to desecrate a religious symbol that belongs to someone else.....cause thats not important to you.
The statue was not damaged. Your argument is stupid.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
