RE: Is "being the creator of everything" an essential characteristic of the ...
October 5, 2014 at 11:00 pm
(This post was last modified: October 5, 2014 at 11:05 pm by fr0d0.)
(October 5, 2014 at 3:28 pm)genkaus Wrote: Being destructive does not preclude him from producing anything. For all you know, his reason for creation might be that he could build things up only to destroy them later on.
Not if he wasn't the first cause, no. But then that's not what I said is it?
(October 5, 2014 at 3:30 pm)Chuck Wrote: Are you really such a big idiot that you can believe in any of what you just said?
If I was talking about my beliefs that might stick
![Wink Wink](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/wink.gif)
(October 5, 2014 at 4:31 pm)Baqal Wrote:Try harder(October 5, 2014 at 3:25 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Because something bad = something destructive yes?Um... No?
(October 5, 2014 at 4:31 pm)Baqal Wrote:Yes, I have. Ignoring it isn't challenging it.Quote:A first cause of everything can't be destructive. It couldn't produce anything. Therefore, if existence had a creator, that had to be a positive force.Well, at least it could produce something to destroy it later on. You haven't presented a valid argument for why the Creator has to be good.
(October 5, 2014 at 4:31 pm)Baqal Wrote: I would ask you "Why would God need people to love Him, worship Him et cetera?"Change of subject, right... He doesn't need anything. We need him. I'd kiss you on the cheeks but I think that's your bum
![Wink Wink](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/wink.gif)