SCOTUS pusses out on gay marriage.

[Jenny A]

They had previously set the groundwork in Romer v Evans, Jen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romer_v._Evans

Finding that "laws of the kind now before us raise the inevitable inference that the disadvantage imposed is born of animosity toward the class of persons affected," the Court inferred that the passage of Amendment 2 was born of a "bare...desire to harm a politically unpopular group".[2] The Court added: "[I]f the constitutional conception of 'equal protection of the laws' means anything, it must at the very least mean that a bare ... desire to harm a politically unpopular group cannot constitute a legitimate governmental interest."(emphasis added)[

Yes then did Min. But they didn't extend it. I hope they do. But they tend to follow public sentiment. The more states and circuits, the better.