(June 28, 2010 at 3:29 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: http://www.thercg.org/questions/p112.a.html
"Acts 1:18 describes what occurred after Judas hanged himself in Matthew 27:5"
http://www.jba.gr/Articles/nkjv_jbaother3.htm
"Acts 1:15-20 and Matthew 27:3-8 speak for two different pieces of land."
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/143
"Once again, God’s Word can be seen to be internally consistent. Additionally, the explanations offered above form a pattern that can be used in answering such charges—i.e., whenever two seemingly contradictory accounts are under consideration, they could actually be complementary to one another."
Nah. Its contradictory alright. Some of the stuff that you've linked to is plain dumb, I'm afraid. For example, one of the authors claims that the two texts refer to different pieces of land. Judas is supposed to have bought land with his 30 pieces of silver...and then still had the 30 pieces to throw down in front of the priests. Obvious nonsense.
He who desires to worship God must harbor no childish illusions about the matter but bravely renounce his liberty and humanity.
Mikhail Bakunin
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything
Friedrich Nietzsche
Mikhail Bakunin
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything
Friedrich Nietzsche