To explain knowledge of God

[Esquilax]

This would be a valid Arguement if said proof was not offered to anyone who didnot A/S/K for it. As it is you do not have proof because you have not followed the prescription to receive it.

This would be a valid rebuttal if the procedure to A/S/K wasn't an unfalsifiable labyrinth of ad hoc rationalizations, retrofitted handwaving and excuses, all built around a core of vague, unassailable illogic. As it is you don't have a prescription to receive evidence of god because you will never accept the possibility that it might fail.