RE: To explain knowledge of God
October 15, 2014 at 5:52 pm
(This post was last modified: October 15, 2014 at 5:54 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(October 15, 2014 at 1:59 pm)Drich Wrote: it a simple way of pointing out that you did not follow instructions as provided.
what is the difference between baking a cake and a loaf of bread? The ingredience are basically the same, flour, milk eggs, butter, baking soda etc.. so why when following the directions of bread, do I not come out with cake?
Does this example begg the question in your opinion? If it does then maybe you should look up the term you are misusing, before I get the pleasure of doing it for you.
It is indeed begging the question, to wit: you're citing the Bible's recipe to find god, when it is the veracity of that evil book that is in question. Also, if you have to believe in god in order to see him, then you're requiring presupposition.
So your god isn't even smart enough to figure out that he'd get more followers if he actually showed up every so often ... why should I worship a dingbat like that?
(October 15, 2014 at 1:59 pm)Drich Wrote: No other religion has their God interact with the common man. Only Prophets and emisarries have that right even in OT judisim.
It looks like Adam, Eve, Moses, Noah, and a host of others didn't get that memo.
Cherry-picking run amok, uprooting entire trees.
