RE: To explain knowledge of God
October 21, 2014 at 12:25 pm
(This post was last modified: October 21, 2014 at 12:58 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(October 16, 2014 at 12:04 pm)professor Wrote: You guys never fail to provide me with mirth.
Learning about this Satan character comes from a myriad of sources including the Bible.
Do you know nothing about the civilizations that went before the veneration of Darwin?
Since Darwin isn't exactly venerated, that's a very vague period of time, but yes. You don't see Satan before the Bible.
(October 15, 2014 at 1:29 pm)Drich Wrote: I suppose the question would be how many cultures DIDN'T have evil spirits?
Lucifer seems to have been a great angel who fell, a specific being, not just any 'evil spirit'. How many cultures didn't have gods? When the Japanese talked about Amaterasu, did they really mean God, or are they both specific persons?
(October 15, 2014 at 1:29 pm)Drich Wrote: The naturalist, unable (unwilling?) to grasp anything he can't fit in a test tube, just rejects everything which went before his superior "Enlightenment".
Mostly just the supernatural parts, and that only requires methodological naturalism, not metaphysical naturalism.
(October 15, 2014 at 1:29 pm)Drich Wrote: when you see Beyonce , and a number of other celebrities making the illuminati triangle, winking at you or holding their hands in the triple 6 mode, or the devil horned hand sign (done also by many world leaders, beside entertainers)- these people are signaling their allegiance to something unseen.
Or illustrating that many humans are unconscious of how they're so wired to find patterns that it's almost impossible not to find them if you look.
Your ability to evaluate evidence is so crippled that about the only way you can be right about something is by coincidence.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.