(October 23, 2014 at 7:51 am)professor Wrote: The A/S/K method Drich tells us of goes like this-
Idea / investigation, experimentation/ development/ new reality.
It is the scientific method.
How can you not see it?
Because the scientific method relies on:
Falsifiability, whereas none of you people will even consider a failure state for the ASK method.
Repeatability, whereas ASK does not produce reliable results over repeatable tests.
Peer review, whereas none of you will even entertain the idea that other variables might be contaminating your results, above and beyond the one variable you want to be real.
Don't start claiming things are scientific until you're ready to work to science's standards, Prof. All you're doing right now is co-opting the reputation of science while hoping to avoid any of the work involved. But if you really, truly think that ASK is scientific, then write a report and submit it to a mainstream scientific publication for peer review, see how that works out for you.
I am, however, a realist. I'm fairly certain that instead of doing that, you'll proceed to whine about how all of science is biased against your god. In which case I'd ask you why you bothered claiming ASK is scientific at all, if you're then going to turn around and denigrate science the moment it doesn't confirm what you want to believe.

"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!