(October 28, 2014 at 3:02 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: To say that you disbelieve because there is no evidence, when such evidence is logically impossible, is not rational.
So how does the position, "there can be no evidence for god, therefore no evidence of god is required," get to be more rational than disbelief?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!