RE: Your stance on Hard Atheism
October 28, 2014 at 4:18 pm
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2014 at 4:20 pm by fr0d0.)
(October 28, 2014 at 3:19 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(October 28, 2014 at 3:02 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: To say that you disbelieve because there is no evidence, when such evidence is logically impossible, is not rational.
So how does the position, "there can be no evidence for god, therefore no evidence of god is required," get to be more rational than disbelief?
I'm sorry, I searched everywhere to try and find where someone said that and drew a blank. Could you kindly link me to the totally unrelated content please?
(October 28, 2014 at 3:13 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: No. The definition is *absent*. *Without* a definition the question is incoherent.
Well I saw at least two. Hard atheist: someone who knows for sure that God doesn't exist.