Your stance on Hard Atheism

[Esquilax]

Please try to engage your brain esq. I was addressing a particular type of evidence that was exactly prompted. I didn't say "there can be no evidence for God", for there clearly can be, and I have repeatedly and at length spelled this out to you. Now please refrain from acting the imbecile, as I'm forced to look at your diatribe.,

No, what you've done is asserted repeatedly that you have sufficient evidence and justification to believe in god, evidence that you have grown remarkably evasive about demonstrating or even explaining when the question is put to you. Then, when atheists start asking for the sort of evidence that one should realistically be able to expect from anything that really exists, you chide them, explaining that such easily attainable evidence for any other thing is completely impossible for the pervasive lord of the universe.

In essence, you're like any other run of the mill theist: so confident in your reasons for belief right up until the possibility that they might be questioned shows up. Then, it's just haughty dismissive arrogance as a cover for how afraid of opening up your beliefs to criticism you really are.