RE: Your stance on Hard Atheism
October 29, 2014 at 3:35 pm
(This post was last modified: October 29, 2014 at 3:36 pm by fr0d0.)
(October 29, 2014 at 10:25 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:(October 28, 2014 at 6:23 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: 10 is indeed a significant number
A significant number of what? People who are 'hard atheists' or people who don't think 'hard atheism' is irrational? Do you think there is 100% overlap in those two groups? Not everyone who disagrees with me is being irrational. It's not a given that if you reach a different conclusion from mine, that it is an irrational conclusion.
(October 28, 2014 at 9:09 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: That would be true if the op hadn't clearly defined gnostic atheism as opposed to anti theism. One up to you for ignorance about the thread
The OP did clearly defined the term as gnostic atheism, and then pretty much continually used it as a synonym for anti-theism in practice.
People who don't think hard atheism is irrational. To think that is to align with hard atheism. You can't agree with that and not be a gnostic atheist. Even though I'm fascinated with the stance, I am in no doubt that it's irrational.
Ah OK.
