Your stance on Hard Atheism

[fr0d0]

Is it irrational to believe what the evidence leads you to believe? Is it irrational to claim something doesn't exist due to the lack of evidence? Why can't I say "god doesn't exist" but simultaneously I can say "Santa Klaus doesn't exist"? What difference is there?

I believe what the evidence leads me to believe. I think it's irrational to claim something exists that lacks evidence. I believe in God and I believe the Santa Klause tradition originated with an actual person.

You can say what you like. Until you can prove any of it, I will regard it along with pinches of salt.

Irrational = unprovable