(July 1, 2010 at 12:36 pm)mo3taz3nbar Wrote: you are saying this because you think that the result should be that everyone would believe in god but infact the result should be that the good thing and the bad thing is there and everyone can make his choice.
And I've already illustrated why the results that happened would be inevitable. Can you go back to my earlier posts where I discussed this? If you're a Christian living in the 8th century Constantinople, are you seriously going to consider that some guy from another land who was recently born knows the truth about Jesus better than the church established by the very people who were his disciples and apostles?
Some "test", and that puts aside why a just god feels that metaphysical beliefs are the most important thing to consider when judging a person's character.
Quote:of course i agree with you but the problem here is what kind of evidence you are looking for?
Heal Stephen Hawking. Allow him to walk and talk again without the assistance of his machines. Or perform some miracle along these lines, something that can't be explained by natural forces. Then I will convert to Islam.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
