(November 5, 2014 at 12:49 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Ahh, but children can't "die" they just return to God. which is why Jesus refereed to a dead Girl one tame as "asleep" to which the Bible says the "people laughed him to scorn" because they didn't know what he meant.
Wow, that gives me like fifty eight methods of attack.
First of all, I expect you'll never again use free will as an excuse for god's actions, since you've just accepted and endorsed the fact that god violated the free will of these children when it was convenient to him. Secondly, you're apparently okay with god requiring that these babies be violently murdered, rather than just letting them pass away in their sleep before the attack. Speaking of which, why would god bother to let all those babies be born anyway, if he was just going to kill them so early in their lives? Did he just really need to see some babies being gutted? That's pretty sick.
Hey, couldn't god have instead had those kids adopted out into the families of his followers, so they could have led rich lives helping people on earth, instead of just being... you know, pointlessly slaughtered?
What I find particularly telling about this is that you give no thought at all to the needless infliction of mortal injury on babies. Regardless of whether they went to heaven or not- and I think this is just a dodge on your part- the act of killing a baby is still deeply immoral and disturbing, yet you're apparently okay with it, or pretending you are, to win rhetorical points. The inhumanity of christianity shows again.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!