RE: NAACP, Are they really for the advancement of colored people?
November 9, 2014 at 8:12 pm
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2014 at 8:13 pm by Heywood.)
(November 9, 2014 at 7:59 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(November 9, 2014 at 7:57 pm)Heywood Wrote: I would think that an organization whose purpose is to advance colored people would celebrate when colored people are advanced into frontiers which where previously closed to them.
This organization doesn't really care about advancing color people. It cares about advancing ideology.
Again, it's a press release. Individually it's hardly more than a tertiary concern for an organization that actually does any work. The fact that you're still so rigidly focused on appearances just proves my point.
This isn't a case of telling a book by its cover. Its a case of examining the fruits to understand the tree. The NAACP doesn't really care about the advancement of colored people. If they did the first black senator elected in the south since reconstruction would be a big deal to them. They would celebrate it not down play it or pretend it didn't happen by ignoring it completely.
In this cycle the republicans also elected the youngest woman ever to go to congress. The feminist at least acknowledged it as a victory for women....they put in the caveat that they wished she was a democrat....but acknowledged that her victory was still another victory for women in general and should be celebrated. The NAACP can't even do that......what does it say about them?
